April 13, 2022
8 minutes read
Organizations in every industry must ensure a safe working environment for employees and achieve safety compliance enterprise-wide. However, despite stringent regulations, regular safety drills, and safety management systems, non-fatal and fatal injuries in the workplace are still an issue for businesses.
According to National Safety Council research, the total cost of workplace injuries in 2018 reached $170.8 billion, or $1.100 per worker; the price per medically consulted injury was $41,000. The cost per death was $1,190,000.
The reasons for accidents happen many. A significant portion of them, however, can be attributed to the so-called human factors (also known as human reliability) — a wide range of conditions affecting human performance and decision-making, including age, state of mind, physical health, attitude, emotions, propensity for inevitable common mistakes, errors, and cognitive biases.
Humans make mistakes — it is well-known — but we also “operate” in environments designed, built, and managed by us, which only contributes to accident potential. That is why every one of us needs oversight by a third party in one form or another. Traditionally, it is carried out by health and safety personnel.
With the advance of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), intelligent process automation and safety control systems can provide such oversight as well, to minimize risks, reduce fatal and non-fatal injuries, streamline safety procedures, and look into data to come up with new ways to improve health and safety in the workplace.
This article will explore why businesses automate safety control and why over-reliance on safety officers and manual routines can be dangerous to employees. We will talk about safety in healthcare organizations, including epidemiological safety. Finally, we will provide an overview of AI-enabled PPE detection solutions for epidemiological protection.
It is in every business’s best interest to keep employees healthy and safe at work. Over the years, a significant number of various safety practices have been designed and implemented across different industries, yet none of them managed to eradicate worker injury.
The conventional approach to worker safety is that workers must follow specific rules like wearing personal protective equipment (PPE), staying sober at work, using mechanical aids when necessary, and taking regular breaks. In theory, a specific set of rules designed for every practice area should help avoid occupational safety hazards.
The problem is that we as species tend to break rules rather than follow them. Not on purpose, but intuitively, at-risk behaviors regularly occur in the workplace. Bad decision-making, unintentional mistakes, and disregard for procedures that we consider unjustified are factors that cause injuries and accidents.
To solve this “human” problem, businesses should act proactively and holistically adopt two safety strategies, which are:
These two strategies offer a radically different approach to stringent but ineffective control by supervisors and safety managers and perfectly complement regular safety drills and training to help workers follow safety rules and regulations as part of their daily routine.
In other words, organizations in pretty much every industry can’t help but automate safety control in one way or another. No amount of talking and reading about safety helps. In contrast, the effectiveness of safety drills must be supported by someone (or something) — be it a safety manager or an automated system — who offers corrective action in real-time. And in that context, deploying a system that never needs a break but surveils all workers all the time seems a more effective and cost-efficient solution.
Amid the coronavirus pandemic, it becomes clearer how important safety control and epidemiological safety, specifically, are. As of May 2020, no less than 90,000 healthcare workers globally were infected with COVID-19. Since physicians, nurses, and medical staff still lacked PPE and testing kits, it could be twice that number.
In the United States, as of April 2020, around 10,000 healthcare workers were reported to have COVID-19 by the Center for Disease Prevention. At least 130 of them died from the contagious virus.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought numerous problems of the US healthcare system into sharp focus, such as rising costs, administrative inefficiency, lack of proper coverage, and unethical, restrictive practices of for-profit insurance companies.
Most importantly, however, the crisis revealed how reckless humans could be when it comes to the health and well-being of other people and their own. While some people “forget” to wear masks and follow social distancing rules, others openly disregard them. No wonder both governments and businesses have to respond with facial tracking solutions capable of mask detection.
In the context of epidemiological safety, human factors and certain human behaviors cannot and must not be ignored. Violations of safety rules like not wearing PPE result in faster infection transmission and a much higher incidence rate among staff. Human factors demonstrate the limitations of manual control, and automating safety control and PPE compliance becomes a top priority for healthcare organizations on the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Most importantly, however, the crisis revealed how reckless humans could be when it comes to the health and well-being of other people and their own. While some people “forget” to wear masks and follow social distancing rules, others openly disregard them. No wonder both governments and businesses have to respond with facial tracking solutions capable of mask detection. Ensuring PPE compliance amidst the pandemic is one of the most critical objectives for governments and healthcare organizations. To flatten the curve, it is necessary to reduce the virus transmission rate, which personal safety gear helps.
The automated PPE detection uses computer vision, image analysis, and advanced analytics to detect, monitor, and track how medical staff, or lab workers, comply with safety regulations such as wearing face masks or respirators, protective glasses, gloves, and coats. It processes live video streams from high-resolution cameras, evaluates the item’s missing probability, and reports violations to safety personnel should any be detected. Processing and analysis are performed in real-time to make it easier for safety staff to address violations as soon as they occur.
In addition to that, the solutions for automated PPE detection are designed to measure body temperature and to report to safety personnel if any anomalies are identified. Because the software sports a face recognition feature, all violations are registered with an ID attached, which means corrective action can be taken individually. VITech has experience in developing such solutions. If you want to know more, just contact us.
Predictive analytics in healthcare: benefits and challenges
Modern technologies, including Big Data and machine learning, have opened new horizons for the predictive analytics and decision support systems market. With proper use, they will be the next step in the digital transformation of any industry, including healthcare. Today, the market for predictive analytics is exceptionally fast-growing. According to a study by AMR, from…
State of data science and ML in healthcare
VITech is pleased to reveal the results of the State of data science and ML in the healthcare survey that we conducted on LinkedIn in 2019. The survey sought to look into the scope and patterns of data science and machine learning adoption in the healthcare industry. Over 50 qualified respondents represented a variety of…
How is predictive analytics used in healthcare: TOP 10 examples
Smart healthcare is the future of the healthcare system. This revolution is already impacting the daily work of healthcare professionals and the practice of patient care. The changes taking place can provide solutions to many problems. Still, they also require us to rethink how we organize the health system, shifting the focus from treatment to…
ML-based system or why we use сomputer-aided systems in healthcare
Healthcare companies — providers or payers — have historically relied on computers for administrative tasks. However, new use cases have emerged as technology matured and the industry digitized. Today, hardly any clinic operates without a fleet of computers to store and manage patient/facility data, monitor patients and equipment, perform operations, and research. The advance in…
Benefits of EHR: Advantages and disadvantages for patients and medical staff
According to the analytical agency Frost&Sullivan, the market for digital medical solutions in 2021 amounted to $6 billion. At the same time, annual growth approached the 40% mark. This means that in the world’s developed countries, there is a significant growth in electronic medical records, the possibility of remote patient management, and the sale of…
How to provide diagnostics accuracy while lacking time
Poor systems deliver poor results, and, in the case of US healthcare, the pile of problems has been growing for years. From lack of transparency to high costs and administrative inefficiency, the system has created an environment where patients and medical staff suffer.
How to achieve earlier lung disease detection: the automated approach
Most of us never think about our breathing; it’s just something we do. For example, research by Lung Foundation Australia shows that almost half of all Australians rarely or never think about their lung health. Despite this, almost two-thirds of Australians reported that they had experienced at least one lung-related health issue.